May 28th, 2001, 16:20
|
#1 |
|
Elite
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Somewhere in California, between L.A./ S.D.
Posts: 730
(View Stats)
Rep Power: 10  |
Not Ranked
:
0
Frame rails vs Back-Half
If you 4-Link the rear-end.... of a full-size truck, what are the Pro's and Con's of keeping the frame or getting rid of it ??????? Submit your posts Thanks
|
|
|
|
May 28th, 2001, 23:28
|
#2 |
|
Loyal
|
Not Ranked
:
0
Re: Frame rails vs Back-Half
pro lesser amount of work
con less wheel travel available |
|
|
|
|
May 29th, 2001, 15:35
|
#3 |
|
- users no longer part of the rdc family -
|
Not Ranked
:
0
Re: Frame rails vs Back-Half
pro-still race class 8
con-sits "stink-bug", less travel, higher center of gravity |
|
|
|
|
May 30th, 2001, 00:32
|
#4 |
|
- users no longer part of the rdc family -
|
Not Ranked
:
0
Re: Frame rails vs Back-Half
Frame rail Pro: Less $$$$$
Frame rail con: Less Travel No rails Pro: More Travel No rails con: More $$$$$ Frame = Less No Frame = More Shaun 
|
|
|
|
|
May 30th, 2001, 12:16
|
#5 |
|
RDC Addicted
|
Not Ranked
:
0
Re: Frame rails vs Back-Half
Depends on what truck? If your using a JEEP J10 frame, it already hes about a 10" kick in it if you add a c-chanel to that, you can't get much lower.
|
|
|
|
|
May 30th, 2001, 16:21
|
#6 |
|
Prospect
|
Not Ranked
:
0
Re: Frame rails vs Back-Half
if you EVER plan on racing it (or selling it for that matter, class legal trucks are easier to sell) then leave the frame rails. If it's going to be a fun car or you're just going to race every once in a while with small organizations, you could probably get away with the rear tubular
|
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
